Conventional vs. organic farming
The word "organic" refers to the way farmers grow and process agricultural products, such as fruits, vegetables, grains, dairy products and meat. Organic farming practices are designed to encourage soil and water conservation and reduce pollution. Farmers who grow organic produce and meat don't use conventional methods to fertilize, control weeds or prevent livestock disease. For example, rather than using chemical weedkillers, organic farmers may conduct more sophisticated crop rotations and spread mulch or manure to keep weeds at bay.
Here are some key differences between conventional farming and organic farming:
Organic or not? Check the label
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has established an organic certification program that requires all organic foods to meet strict government standards. These standards regulate how such foods are grown, handled and processed.
Any product labeled as organic must be USDA certified. Only producers who sell less than $5,000 a year in organic foods are exempt from this certification; however, they're still required to follow the USDA's standards for organic foods.
If a food bears a USDA Organic label, it means it's produced and processed according to the USDA standards. The seal is voluntary, but many organic producers use it.
Products certified 95 percent or more organic display this USDA seal.
Products that are completely organic — such as fruits, vegetables, eggs or other single-ingredient foods — are labeled 100 percent organic and can carry the USDA seal.
Foods that have more than one ingredient, such as breakfast cereal, can use the USDA organic seal plus the following wording, depending on the number of organic ingredients:
- 100 percent organic. To use this phrase, products must be either completely organic or made of all organic ingredients.
- Organic. Products must be at least 95 percent organic to use this term.
Products that contain at least 70 percent organic ingredients may say "made with organic ingredients" on the label, but may not use the seal. Foods containing less than 70 percent organic ingredients can't use the seal or the word "organic" on their product labels. They can include the organic items in their ingredient list, however.
Do 'organic' and 'natural' mean the same thing?
No, "natural" and "organic" are not interchangeable terms. You may see "natural" and other terms such as "all natural," "free-range" or "hormone-free" on food labels. These descriptions must be truthful, but don't confuse them with the term "organic." Only foods that are grown and processed according to USDA organic standards can be labeled organic.
Sounds great, right? Pretty simple? Nope. Even though organic farming takes out some problems with conventional COMMERCIAL farming, there are still plenty of issues.
1. Becoming USDA certified organic is costly - both in time and money. Here is a link to the process. Many of the smaller farms that I've talked to say that it's just not worth it to them, which means much of the USDA certified produce you find in the store is still from huge commercial farms that can afford to become certified.
2. Commercial organic farms still have the biggest problem that we see in conventional commercial farms: they only grow one thing and a lot of it. That's called a monoculture. Nature just does not function this way! When you try to grow a huge amount of one crop, you run into a number of problems (pests and soil depletion being my biggest concerns). So how do you deal with that? You have to use natural means like tilling the soil constantly, shipping in manure/compost, etc.
3. Since an increasing amount of our produce is coming from other countries, can we trust that they are legitimately organic? Here is one article that surfaced in 2010 regarding Chinese imports to Whole Foods. There still are a lot of questions when it comes to "real" organic being imported. Here is another article discussing the issue more recently.
All in all, commercial organic farming is not very efficient (and not extremely trustworthy) and studies show that the fruits and vegetables produced by these means are not really any better for you than conventional studies. Again from the Mayo Clinic:
Organic food: Is it more nutritious?
The answer isn't yet clear. A recent study examined the past 50 years' worth of scientific articles about the nutrient content of organic and conventional foods. The researchers concluded that organically and conventionally produced foodstuffs are comparable in their nutrient content. Research in this area is ongoing.
Here is a good article for you if you'd like to read more:
Even though it's from 2002, most places I've looked say we're still at the same point: organic produce from the grocery store is not nutritionally superior, but does have significantly less pesticide residue. So they've got that going for them.
Here is an article that's more recent. Again, seems like the major pitfalls come from commercial farming.
So, when it comes to money votes, here's where I come down:
- I vote to purchase produce from local, small farms whenever possible. I RESEARCH the farms I buy from and ask lots of questions. Just because they are a small farm doesn't mean they are doing things right! Well-run family farms are able to avoid the pitfalls of commercial farms (meaning they are extremely efficient and sustainable). To see a great breakdown of family farm operations vs. commercial/industrial, click here. There is still a lot of research to be done to find out if locally grown, small farm food is better than what we find in the store, but here is one initial article that is fantastic:
- When it's not possible, I vote to purchase some organic foods, specifically those that are produced in the USA (which means they should REALLY be organic). That means eating mostly seasonally again, because you are just not going to find watermelons or apples from the USA in January. Here is a great list of seasonal food items (you can even search by region or season). Here is a list of the fruits/veggies that tend to absorb the most and the least pesticides. I try to buy all berries, leafy greens and tree fruits organic when I can't buy them locally. I don't buy all of my food organic (because of the reasons stated above). Local and small-farmed is best, some organic is good.
- I vote for produce that has a label stating where it is grown. Luckily, many stores are starting to advertise whether it's "Grown in the USA!" and many labels now subtly say where they were grown (think berry packages). If it's not labelled, I avoid it. I definitely buy produce from other countries (like bananas from Ecuador or various products from Mexico), but I want to support those companies that are labeling their food!
I love the idea of voting with our money, and I agree it's important to pay attention to the impacts of our food. I enjoy reading your posts, and I look forward to many to come!
ReplyDeleteHopefully you'll forgive me for expressing a contrasting point of view. =)
I don't believe organic food is always better for the planet. For one thing, yields are 40-50% lower, which means 1.6-2x more land and water are required to grow organic food, which means more native plants and animals are crowded out and caused to go extinct. Thanks to agrotechnology, yields improved 300% from 1961 to 2000, while planted area increased only 12%. If yields had stayed the same over that time period, the equivalent of two additional South American continents would have needed to be planted in crops in order to feed us all. That would be a catastrophe for the environment.
Organic food is not always safe, either. In 2011, organic beansprouts in Germany, contaminated by organic manure fertilizer, caused the organic deaths of 53 people, and serious kidney damage for 3500 others (a human health disaster about the same size as Chernobyl). We do not need chemicals to be poisoned by food - natural means are just as effective.
To be honest, I think much of our current attention on organic food is about economic signaling rather than health or environmental concerns. We humans love to show others that we have more stuff than the next guy. Food is just today's frontier of conspicuous consumption. The more exclusive and expensive the food production method, the more virtuous. And you can brag about it because, hey, you're just trying to save the planet and be healthy.
The promise of organic food is tempting: who doesn't want health and a clean environment? But I'm not convinced the benefits are all that real, especially on a global scale.
I choose to vote non-organic with my money, because I believe in science and progress, and I see the organic movement as reactionary and elitist. I believe the billions of people living in the developing world deserve to eat healthy food just as much as I do. Organic food production just can't make that happen; for that to occur, we need as much agrotechnology as we can invent. This is why I choose non-organic food.
Cindy! I love this. Keep them coming!! I love to read about this kind of stuff and it is awesome that you have sited so many sources. Thanks for sharing your info! Seriously, I'm really enjoying it. :)
ReplyDeleteI agree that organic isn't a fail safe solution for all our food problems, but the health hazards associated with a lot of pesticides and gmo products are quite proven. Like always, I think it's up to the reader to use this information in a balanced and personally beneficial way.
ReplyDeleteWhile you maybe can't afford organic (myself included), purchasing from stores or markets with local produce (or from small, local farms) is a great alternative. I love having a lot of this information in one place :) keep em coming!
I love both your thoughts Cindy as well as hearing Recession Cone's thoughts. One reason I choose organic when I can is because I have food allergies and intolerances and I think GMO food is contributing to it. Did you know that potatoes unless organic are spliced with corn? Also the mass processing of meat and the way it's handled is a big problem.
ReplyDelete